Compact crossovers are immensely popular in the U.S., and Mazda offers two compelling options: the CX-50 and the CX-5. While they share similarities, they have distinct differences. We aim to determine which one provides the best value for your money, the 2024 Mazda CX-50 vs. 2024 Mazda CX-5. Be sure to watch the video linked below for a full in-depth comparison.
Pricing and Equipment
For 2024, both the CX-50 and CX-5 see price increases. The fully-loaded CX-50 Premium Plus now starts at $45,125, while the CX-5 Signature comes in at $41,975.
Exterior Design
The CX-50 emphasizes ruggedness with a macho, squared-off appearance, catering to Americans who crave a tough SUV aesthetic. In contrast, the CX-5 boasts a more premium and smooth design, with chrome instead of black finishing on the grille. While both models feature premium full-LED adaptive lighting, neither includes fog lights.
Length: 185.8-inches (CX-50) | 179.1-inches (CX-5)
Examining the sides, the CX-50 embraces ruggedness with extensive matte black plastic, while the CX-5 maintains a body-color look. Despite being similarly sized, the CX-50 is significantly longer than the CX-5, giving it space for larger contrast 20-inch wheels, while the CX-5 tops out with 19-inch alloys.
Interior Design
Inside, both models offer smart entry systems and premium materials. The CX-5 Signature stands out with Nappa leather seats, while both models feature 10-way power-adjustable seats with memory and heating. The CX-5 takes the lead in material quality with additional leatherette and genuine wood trim. Both models sport 10.25-inch high-resolution displays with Mazda software and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The CX-50 adds an advantage with two extra speakers in its Bose audio system.
CX-5: 10-speaker Bose CenterPoint audio
CX-50: 12-speaker Bose CenterPoint audio
Rear Seats and Cargo
Despite its longer length, the CX-50 doesn’t provide additional rear legroom. Both models offer rear vents, USB ports, and heated rear seats. The CX-5 maintains interior materials in the rear, while the CX-50 uses hard plastic.
CX-50: 39.8 inches of legroom | 38.6-inches of headroom
CX-5: 39.6 inches for legroom | 39.0-inches headroom
In terms of cargo, the CX-50 surprisingly offers less space than the CX-5, with the latter having a more versatile folding mechanism.
CX-50: Behind 2nd row: 31.4 cubic feet | Max: 56.3 cu.ft
CX-5: Behind 2nd row: 30.9 cubic feet | Max: 59.6 cu.ft
Powertrain
Both the CX-50 and CX-5 come equipped with a 2.5L Turbo I-4 engine producing 256 hp and 320 lb.ft of torque, paired with a 6-speed automatic and standard AWD. They offer impressive driving dynamics but fall behind in fuel economy, with ratings of 24-25 MPG combined.
The “Old man” takes the win!
Though the CX-5 is the objective winner, your choice between the CX-50 and CX-5 depends on your preferences:
CX-5:
- Refined and premium design.
- Premium cabin materials.
- More maximum cargo space.
- Independent rear suspension.
CX-50:
- Rugged, off-road design.
- More premium features (panoramic moonroof, auto-dimming mirrors, 20-inch wheels).
- Higher tow rating.
- Built in the U.S. (Alabama vs. Hiroshima).
Ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities. Share your preference in the comments! Whether you prefer the rugged persona of the CX-50 or the premium allure of the CX-5, both Mazda crossovers offer a blend of style and performance. Thank you for joining us for another Car Confections comparison! Be sure to watch the video linked below for a full in-depth comparison.
Recent Comments